tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post4104232868230949677..comments2023-11-02T06:37:23.839-06:00Comments on daveberta.ca: oberqualization.davebertahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06822739409684978316noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-74255184546979615062007-04-02T09:44:00.000-06:002007-04-02T09:44:00.000-06:00Lenny ... go to bed!Lenny ... go to bed!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-4942364445170952342007-03-24T18:02:00.000-06:002007-03-24T18:02:00.000-06:00Yeah, doesn't fall for the crap that Fekete writes...Yeah, doesn't fall for the crap that Fekete writes in the Calgary Herald. The guy thinks be's a Woodward and Bernstein, but I can assure you he reminds me more of Rick Bell and Neil Waugh in terms of the absence of lack of access to what really goes on within government.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-92079926051310279212007-03-20T15:06:00.000-06:002007-03-20T15:06:00.000-06:00While, I guess that Stelmach and Oberg were on the...While, I guess that Stelmach and Oberg were on the same page all along on equalization.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-39050491641911629412007-03-16T16:49:00.000-06:002007-03-16T16:49:00.000-06:00Anonymous 3:26I am an expert on the equalization.H...Anonymous 3:26<BR/><BR/>I am an expert on the equalization.<BR/><BR/>Hint, go back to the article by Jason Markusoff in the Edmonton Journal on February 14, 2007.<BR/><BR/>Then go through your choices again, and give some thought as to who understands the issue of equalization and who doesn't as of March 16, 2007.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-3727835772078604252007-03-16T15:26:00.000-06:002007-03-16T15:26:00.000-06:00I see this as having three possibilities:a) End Ga...I see this as having three possibilities:<BR/><BR/>a) End Game: Stelmach and Oberg clearly disagree and Stelmach has no control over his cabinet.<BR/><BR/>b) The Braid Theory: Stelmach gave Oberg the "wink wink, nudge nudge" to publicly disagree with him in order to either cushion the blow from the Feds or give the appearance of caucus freedom of speech.<BR/><BR/>c) Stelmach and Oberg really do disagree, but Stelmach will tolerate internal dissent.<BR/><BR/>I tend to think it's b or c, but it is Oberg so there is a very strong change it could be a. If it's c Stelmach needs to be careful that he doesn't let it out of hand.<BR/><BR/>Are we getting spun. Maybe. Maybe not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com