tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post610486529908121048..comments2023-11-02T06:37:23.839-06:00Comments on daveberta.ca: the next pm.davebertahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06822739409684978316noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-40585782212860511632007-04-11T11:35:00.000-06:002007-04-11T11:35:00.000-06:00Nope, you're not the only one.Nope, you're not the only one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10290429.post-57516483422788859362007-04-11T10:44:00.000-06:002007-04-11T10:44:00.000-06:00I guess every country needs their version of royal...I guess every country needs their version of royalty. Or maybe "needs" is not correct. Scratch that. The media of every country like to have their version of royalty. It sells papers, I guess.<BR/><BR/>The U.S. has the Kennedy's - well the remnants of that family. I guess we have the Trudeaus by default. I'm certainly no fan of the patriarch of that clan, but by comparison to the Kennedy's they look pretty good, out-to-lunch Castro-philes or no.<BR/><BR/>Maybe if Mulroney had had more children... ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com