Friday, July 03, 2009
know your power lines better, alberta.
Kevin Kuchinski has written an excellent (and lengthy) essay on the politics of power line in Alberta and Bill 50: Electrical Statutes Amendment Act.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"...Dave Cournoyer isn't some obscure fat frat boy with a sticky-up haircut." - Neil Waugh (Edmonton Sun)

I can be reached by email at: daveberta.ca@gmail.com.
alberta blogs alain saffel / alberta education / albertosaurus talks /albertaviews blog / alex abboud / andrew mcintyre / atypical albertan / berry patch perspective / better edmonton / big block of cheese / bill given / both barrels / brittney leblanc / calgarygrit / calgary rants / capital notebook / chris labossiere / colby cosh / darryl raymaker / david climenhaga / diversions and happenstance / djkelly.ca / don iveson / earl j. woods / ed-vocate / enlightened savage / five of five / four strong winds / gauntlet.ca / grandinite / idealistic pragmatist / jeremy klaszus / ken chapman / kevin powell / the kory story / medhat blog / mark wells / mastermaq / murgatroyd blog / mike soron/ phendrana drifts / politicalgary / pseudo psyence / pt is my homeboy/ revmod / right on course / river city writer / rob breakenridge / the rurban fringe / six meetings / straight outta edmonton / sue huff / summer's daydreams / terahertz / searching for liberty / the story girl / this is just to say / trevor scott howell / u of a law blog / under the hood / unpopular dissent / voice of grant / who's left and who's leaving
blogs from elsewhere abandoned stuff / born with a tail / bow. james bow. / darren barefoot / david akin / desmogblog / huffington post / idicula.ca / james laxer / john gushue / jordan cooper / the hook / laurence miall / michael geist / partisan hobo / peterborough politics / progressive right / pundits' guide / sean shaw / the first drop / we move to canada / west of the fourth / woman at mile 0
smith v. board of education part 1 / part 2 / part 3 / part 4
alberta and greenpeace claims of political interference / it's about site security / tourists at home and abroad
governing myself accordingly: edstelmach.ca premier stelmach threatens to sue alberta blogger over edstelmach.ca / day 2 / the daveberta conspiracy / day 3 / day 4 / day 10 / day 23
alberta election 2008: constituency profiles calgary-buffalo / calgary-currie / calgary-mccall / calgary-varsity / cardston-taber-warner / edmonton-calder / edmonton-castle downs / edmonton-meadowlark
2007 edmonton municipal election non-race for mayor / ward 1 / ward 2 / ward 3 / ward 4 / ward 5 / ward 6
3 comments:
I liked Kevin's essay on this topic, but I think he left out another important reason why we have such a hard time getting transmission projects off the drawing board--it’s the lack of transparency and accountability in government. Consider as an example the spy scandal in 2007 when the energy regulator purchased the services of a private investigator to figure out what dissenting parties were doing. This is significant because what appears to be endemic in Alberta politics is the “fear of getting screwed” When municipal leaders could wake up one morning and learn of a major Government announcement that impacts their community, with no consultation or even so much as a hint, one could forgive the regular Albertan for avoiding eye contact with Government in the hope the regular citizen and their community could hopefully avoid being noticed and becoming the subject of the next great “public good policy” at their expense. Albertans’ need to be able to trust and be able to engage their government, and not have it spoon fed to them by the Public Affairs Bureau or be outright lied to by claiming new Transport Canada regulations have now forced the closure of hospital helipads throughout Alberta .
So I ask you, how in this environment could a regular Albertan could be engaged, without actually becoming a bit militant about an issue that is going to impact them, other than vote with their feet ?
I haven't read the essay. I'll go do it, hoping it explains how one gets any major utility infrastructure built anywhere, ever, with consensus and cooperation by affected "stakeholders."
We'll consensus should be the goal, even if it is not fully achieved. At least it is perferable to the "fear of getting screwed", as the first post wrote about.
Post a Comment