Friday, June 15, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"...Dave Cournoyer isn't some obscure fat frat boy with a sticky-up haircut." - Neil Waugh (Edmonton Sun)
I can be reached by email at: daveberta.ca@gmail.com.
alberta blogs alain saffel / alberta education / albertosaurus talks /albertaviews blog / alex abboud / andrew mcintyre / atypical albertan / berry patch perspective / better edmonton / big block of cheese / bill given / both barrels / brittney leblanc / calgarygrit / calgary rants / capital notebook / chris labossiere / colby cosh / darryl raymaker / david climenhaga / diversions and happenstance / djkelly.ca / don iveson / earl j. woods / ed-vocate / enlightened savage / five of five / four strong winds / gauntlet.ca / grandinite / idealistic pragmatist / jeremy klaszus / ken chapman / kevin powell / the kory story / medhat blog / mark wells / mastermaq / murgatroyd blog / mike soron/ phendrana drifts / politicalgary / pseudo psyence / pt is my homeboy/ revmod / right on course / river city writer / rob breakenridge / the rurban fringe / six meetings / straight outta edmonton / sue huff / summer's daydreams / terahertz / searching for liberty / the story girl / this is just to say / trevor scott howell / u of a law blog / under the hood / unpopular dissent / voice of grant / who's left and who's leaving
blogs from elsewhere abandoned stuff / born with a tail / bow. james bow. / darren barefoot / david akin / desmogblog / huffington post / idicula.ca / james laxer / john gushue / jordan cooper / the hook / laurence miall / michael geist / partisan hobo / peterborough politics / progressive right / pundits' guide / sean shaw / the first drop / we move to canada / west of the fourth / woman at mile 0
smith v. board of education part 1 / part 2 / part 3 / part 4
alberta and greenpeace claims of political interference / it's about site security / tourists at home and abroad
governing myself accordingly: edstelmach.ca premier stelmach threatens to sue alberta blogger over edstelmach.ca / day 2 / the daveberta conspiracy / day 3 / day 4 / day 10 / day 23
alberta election 2008: constituency profiles calgary-buffalo / calgary-currie / calgary-mccall / calgary-varsity / cardston-taber-warner / edmonton-calder / edmonton-castle downs / edmonton-meadowlark
2007 edmonton municipal election non-race for mayor / ward 1 / ward 2 / ward 3 / ward 4 / ward 5 / ward 6
3 comments:
This may be of interest (PFI & PPP are roughly speaking UK equivalents of P3)
http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1052085,00.html
I did a study of the Bradford Schools project when I was a student and interviewed some of the key parties - Headteachers, Architects, Contractors etc. The main problems stemmed from inadequate specification - meaning that the council/schools were expecting to receive facilities & build quality that they had not stated in the original tender documentation and that was not therefore included by the contractors in the price. The result is either a massive bill for additional items or a low grade product. Under traditional procurement methods the price would not be fixed until a later stage in the design process when the client has had the chance to receive expert advice from architects/engineers and the design is much further advanced.
PFI/PPP/P3 can work very well for projects that can be clearly and comprehensively specified - e.g. a 4 lane highway from A to B complying will all national standards, but it is a less effective procurement for non-expert clients such as school boards.
In any case it remains an expensive method of borrowing money for government bodies that are usually able to access borrowing at much cheaper rates that the contractors they employ, but the upside is greater cost certainty and a transfer of the commercial risk away from the public client.
P3s are almost always more expensive. We saw this over and over in Ontario, though Conservative and Liberal governments there. Not looking forward to seeing it confirmed again here.
If Costco was actually overseeing such a thing, given their corporate profile and social attitude, it might actually work out. But I thought the idea of a provincial government being in charge of the fixed assets of education was because they /are/ a form of Costco. An accountable, economical bulk buy force big enough to influence prices and to ably punish substandard contractors slipping through the vetting process. A force not beholden to the profit line, but the non-profit line.
Silly me.
Post a Comment