Alberta Liberal Leader Kevin Taft explains the bottom line on oil and gas royalties: they must rise at least 20%.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
kevin taft on the royalty review.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"...Dave Cournoyer isn't some obscure fat frat boy with a sticky-up haircut." - Neil Waugh (Edmonton Sun)
this blog has moved to a new address: daveberta.ca
Please update your RSS, bookmarks, and links to http://daveberta.ca.
this blog has moved to a new address: daveberta.ca
Please update your RSS and links to http://daveberta.ca.
Posts
informer.
The opinions expressed on this blog represent my own and not those of my employer or any organization I may be affiliated with.
In addition, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time. I consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This blog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of the various ideas running around my brain, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not the same, nor even similar, to those I may hold today.
In addition, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time. I consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This blog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of the various ideas running around my brain, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not the same, nor even similar, to those I may hold today.
twitter.
recent posts.
about the author.
I can be reached by email at: daveberta.ca@gmail.com.
facebook.
daveberta.ca on Facebook
web 2.0
updated blogs.
blogs.
alberta blogs alain saffel / alberta education / albertosaurus talks /albertaviews blog / alex abboud / andrew mcintyre / atypical albertan / berry patch perspective / better edmonton / big block of cheese / bill given / both barrels / brittney leblanc / calgarygrit / calgary rants / capital notebook / chris labossiere / colby cosh / darryl raymaker / david climenhaga / diversions and happenstance / djkelly.ca / don iveson / earl j. woods / ed-vocate / enlightened savage / five of five / four strong winds / gauntlet.ca / grandinite / idealistic pragmatist / jeremy klaszus / ken chapman / kevin powell / the kory story / medhat blog / mark wells / mastermaq / murgatroyd blog / mike soron/ phendrana drifts / politicalgary / pseudo psyence / pt is my homeboy/ revmod / right on course / river city writer / rob breakenridge / the rurban fringe / six meetings / straight outta edmonton / sue huff / summer's daydreams / terahertz / searching for liberty / the story girl / this is just to say / trevor scott howell / u of a law blog / under the hood / unpopular dissent / voice of grant / who's left and who's leaving
blogs from elsewhere abandoned stuff / born with a tail / bow. james bow. / darren barefoot / david akin / desmogblog / huffington post / idicula.ca / james laxer / john gushue / jordan cooper / the hook / laurence miall / michael geist / partisan hobo / peterborough politics / progressive right / pundits' guide / sean shaw / the first drop / we move to canada / west of the fourth / woman at mile 0
guest contributors.
- jason ragan: progressives versus conservatives.
- shannon sortland: a reasoned defence of rural representation.
- chris henderson: how i became a former john mcain fan.
articles elsewhere.
- oct 1, 2009: the cult of king ralph still spins alberta
- sept 17, 2009: ndp convention puts kibosh on cooperation
- june 4, 2009: who cares about local tv?
- june 1 2009: citizen bloggers
- dec 11, 2008: leadership races of the past
- oct 9, 2008: lots of talk, not a lot of decisions
- july 17, 2008: out-side the 10-second box
- may 1, 2008: energy minister wrong about sierra club support
- feb 21, 2008: no clear winners
- feb 14, 2008: shaking off 1971
- oct 10, 2007: out-of-the-box development
- oct 9, 2007: it's about a plan
- sept 25, 2007: voters shouldn't be afraid to 'go shopping'
more daveberta.
smith v. board of education part 1 / part 2 / part 3 / part 4
alberta and greenpeace claims of political interference / it's about site security / tourists at home and abroad
governing myself accordingly: edstelmach.ca premier stelmach threatens to sue alberta blogger over edstelmach.ca / day 2 / the daveberta conspiracy / day 3 / day 4 / day 10 / day 23
alberta election 2008: constituency profiles calgary-buffalo / calgary-currie / calgary-mccall / calgary-varsity / cardston-taber-warner / edmonton-calder / edmonton-castle downs / edmonton-meadowlark
2007 edmonton municipal election non-race for mayor / ward 1 / ward 2 / ward 3 / ward 4 / ward 5 / ward 6
daveberta: the box set.
- April 2010 (10)
- March 2010 (17)
- February 2010 (18)
- January 2010 (21)
- December 2009 (22)
- November 2009 (25)
- October 2009 (29)
- September 2009 (38)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (25)
- June 2009 (37)
- May 2009 (30)
- April 2009 (33)
- March 2009 (41)
- February 2009 (25)
- January 2009 (33)
- December 2008 (32)
- November 2008 (28)
- October 2008 (50)
- September 2008 (58)
- August 2008 (24)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (25)
- May 2008 (29)
- April 2008 (36)
- March 2008 (48)
- February 2008 (54)
- January 2008 (38)
- December 2007 (25)
- November 2007 (31)
- October 2007 (51)
- September 2007 (39)
- August 2007 (29)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (24)
- April 2007 (23)
- March 2007 (18)
- February 2007 (16)
- January 2007 (22)
- December 2006 (27)
- November 2006 (38)
- October 2006 (28)
- September 2006 (39)
- August 2006 (29)
- July 2006 (33)
- June 2006 (43)
- May 2006 (27)
- April 2006 (34)
- March 2006 (24)
- February 2006 (25)
- January 2006 (55)
- December 2005 (47)
- November 2005 (50)
- October 2005 (49)
- September 2005 (42)
- August 2005 (38)
- July 2005 (46)
- June 2005 (60)
- May 2005 (33)
- April 2005 (30)
- March 2005 (27)
- February 2005 (17)
- January 2005 (9)
16 comments:
Great speech. Taft is a leader. Stelmach is looking weak.
I'm not sure a reasoned or measured response can be made during an issue of this dimension by assessing only the words of one political leader. I would suggest that we allow the Premier of Alberta to present his arguments first before resorting to name calling. This is not an argument of us against them, but surely has long-term ramifications far beyond the partisanship that will surely flow from this debate. It would be great if could all see a little further than our own little worlds and conduct ourselves accordingly—with a little dignity and respect for all Albertans.
I would agree that in a normal arena this should be a non-partisan issue, but the issue is clear: Royalties over the past 15 years have not been properly collected due to negligence and gross incompetence within the Ministry of Energy. Billions of dollars failed to be collected because the Ministers of the day - Greg Melchin and Mel Knight - didn't oversee their departments properly. Both of these men are still in Stelmach's cabinet. Both have not been fired for their incompetence as Ministers. How can Albertans 'trust' Ed Stelmach to make the right decisions on royalties when he can't even run his own cabinet with integrity and accountability. I like what Taft has said. It's honest and takes a stand on royalties, a big difference in comparison to what Stelmach as been doing.
Ed Stelmach is not a leader. And it is time for a change.
Libs are in a corner now. Vote for us - send the economy into a tailspin!!
Good on Taft for taking the right position on the issue. The oil companies have been pushing hard on our leaders to back down on royalties, regardless of the fact that the vast large majority of Albertans want their fair share of resource revenues. Taft has taken a strong position and has earned my respect for it.
Stelmach speaks to his biggest failing
Don Braid
Calgary Herald
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
If Premier Ed Stelmach has normal human nerves, he will watch himself with sweaty palms as his first televised speech is broadcast to the province tonight. The government's future could ride on what people think of him.
The speech was pre-recorded in chunks; a good idea, considering the premier's severe challenges as a public speaker. When some of the recording was done, I'm told, he was quite ill with the flu.
Many Tory party members feel rather sick themselves when they hear Stelmach speak in person. They know he's smart and sincere, but when he comes to their towns, they're often stunned by how inept he is on a public platform.
Audiences react to Stelmach the way parents do when their school kid is giving a speech --they lean forward, lips moving, willing him to do well.
Stelmach doesn't provoke anger or annoyance, just a kind of puzzled pity. This guy is really the premier? Routinely, the local dignitaries who introduce him are better speakers.
The whole province could feel that way tonight, unless somebody handcuffed Stelmach to his script until it was safely recorded. The new federal crime bill should prohibit Ed Stelmach from ad libbing.
Yet this premier has brought the royalty issue to a defining point where the entire focus is on him.
He started the royalty review; he made the process highly public, rambling, and ultimately divisive; and now he has to repair the damage. A man who seems to have no trace of the natural gambler has created a situation where the skill he needs most is the very one he lacks.
Because of all these fears, Stelmach's party is divided and uncertain, with some members already pining nostalgically for Ralph Klein's relaxed style of muddling through.
They've watched in horror as the energy industry staged a blubbering public meltdown, predicting a dire future for Alberta if Stelmach adopts all the recommendations from the review commission he appointed.
Tories whisper that all this could have been handled with quiet consultation and then a simple policy announcement on a Friday afternoon.
Stelmach felt the public deserved a far bigger stake in this debate. He's right about that. We can't fault his goals or idealism; but there was a better way to go about it.
On Ken Chapman's excellent Edmonton-based blog, a former minister in Peter Lougheed's government expresses his frustration with Stelmach's methods.
"If the premier felt time was needed why the hell not have a Committee of the Whole public hearing in the legislature -- exactly what was done in December 1972. . . ."
"Then Big Oil could have its say, but to the public at the same time as the government, not behind closed doors. Others had their say too. . . ."
My old pal Chapman, a longtime Tory and consultant, didn't name the ex-minister who sent him the e-mail, either in the blog or when I caught him on the phone.
I have my suspicions, but it hardly matters. The excellent point is that the royalty review could have been done publicly through regular legislature processes, with more legitimacy and less conflict.
Stelmach can make all this right starting tonight, if he looks strong and coherent while presenting sane solutions. He might just pull it off. The premier is no Cicero, but he's not a fool either.
Yet the essential mystery remains: Why did this peculiar leader create a political storm he can only tame by stepping out with a lightning rod in his hand?
dbraid@shaw.ca
Let's try that link again:
link to drilling stats
But rather than making oil sands projects uneconomic, they could encourage the technology development to maximize coal bed methane drilling.
Just a question I hope one of you can answer. Why only 20%? The panel recommended 26% by 2010 (page 17). The 20% was a recommendation if things had changed for 2006, that is a year ago. What the panel was shooting for was 26%. Just wondering if anybody can explain better than the video.
It must be nearly election time! Kevin Taft has started to sound like NDP leader Brian Mason again, and that's a sure sign of an impending vote.
Why don't the Alberta Liberals have any ideas of their own? Why do they even exist? It's such a waste; all the vote splitting that goes on when 2 parties share 1 platform. It's too bad that only the NDP would actually implement these ideas whereas the Liberals would only suck on Big Oil's cash pipeline.
I agree that the vote splitting is a waste.
That's why the NDP should just dissapear.
anon: I have a better idea. Let's make the Liberals disappear and keep the NDP. How's that?
ND who?
I think he's talking about the party that got 1% and 3% of the vote in the summer by-elections.
Didn't the latest poll have the Greens ahead of the ND's?
Brian Mason hasn't figured out that Albertan's stopped taking the New Democrats seriously a LONG LONG TIME AGO.
I'm glad to see the Liberals take the position they did on the royalties situation. I suspect, in light of what the Premier hinted at last night, that Taft has positioned the Liberals between the Tories and the NDs, arguably not a bad place to be.
Post a Comment